![]() The finger-grove grip might not have the class of hardwood, but should offer superior control and some recoil mitigation on what is known as a hard-kicking caliber. Instead, Colt opted to outfit the Anaconda with a set of rubberized Hogue over-molded grips, which many won’t complain about. The barrel is target crowned, adding a touch of protection to the bore. ![]() It boasts a full under-lug and vent-ribbed design of the last iteration of the gun and appears to have a full-length ejection rod. The six-round revolver frame, barrel and cylinder are machined from stainless steel, and polished to a high shine-what Colt calls “Semi-Bright”. Overall, the Colt Anaconda cuts a nearly identical profile to its forbearer-a good thing, for all its initial stumbles the gun was always good looking. 357, which is around 5-pounds in single-action and 10-pounds in double-action. Nevertheless, the overhauled system should play well in the new Anaconda, especially given the original’s was less than desirable. The design improved the Python’s double-action trigger pull considerably from the original, however, it came at the expense of the revolver’s renowned single-action trip. A refresher, it’s a “U” shaped spring that emulates the Python’s original “V” shaped spring but is more conducive to mechanized mass production. In addition to this, the gun utilizes the gunmaker's revamped dual-action leaf-spring found in the. It’s not surprising either, given Colt’s reboot of its revolver line is centered around a scalable frame. Could be, but Colt doesn’t appear to be resting on its laurels, essentially redesigning the revolver, outside of tweaking its original aesthetics.Įssentially, the new Anaconda is a scaled version of the new Python, bulked up of course. Revamping The Serpentĭoes the new Colt Anaconda face similar hurdles this time around? Its old competitors are still around, not to mention some upstarts that have joined the scene since. Though, it never faired well against the competition, which in the 1990s were well established and sucked much of the air out of the double-action. At least it was after Colt ironed out some initial accuracy issues on the original model, which required tweaks to the barrel design. 44 Magnums-particularly the Smith & Wesson Model 29. Understandable, given the massive wheelie drew comparisons to other great. And while it doesn’t quite command the awe of the Python, the Anaconda has perhaps only been second to the icon in Colt fans demanding its return. It’s been almost 20-years since the last large-framed (MM frame in Colt parlance) rolled off the lines in West Hartford, Conn., discontinued in 2003. ![]() Luckily, Colt isn’t finished revamping and releasing its classic revolvers, in fact, with its latest release the gunmaker has gone bigger than ever before. ![]() There’s plenty of serpentine superstars worth rebooting, though a great majority of shooters were satisfied with the rebirth of the Python a year ago. Since Colt dusted off its popular line of “Snake Guns” in 2017 with the Cobra, folks have pondered how far back it’d reach. On the other hand :-) weak hand reload works much better for me with Rugers where traditional strong hand reload typically required me to break grip to manipulate the cylinder latch.Improving on a number of aspects of the original, the 2021 Colt Anaconda keeps the Snake Gun line rolling. Granted that I never really had issue manipulating the cylinder latch of a Colt when using the more typical strong hand reload either. Not sure if that makes any sense but works for me with either Colt or S&W. Use the thumb of the weak hand flagged upward to manipulate the cylinder release latch while the weak hand index finger supports the cylinder and the strong hand index finger pushes the cylinder out of the window. You might want to try the weak hand reload method. Perhaps increased production capacity with no corresponding reduction in quality, will be something that the new Czech masters will provide. The Anaconda, not so much.īut good for CZolt bringing this back. I was very happy to be issued a 92FS, but I remember lusting for a Python. Several of the cadre carried them for duty as did the director, at the time. Our academy had bright stainless Pythons, kept stacked in milk crates, for force on force exercises. My thumb is also too short to reach the latch on a GP100. Is that how one is supposed to open it? My only significant revolver experience is with Smith and Wesson M10s which, at least for opening the cylinder, seem intuitive. Pulling back on the latch, with my strong hand, is impossible for me. Until I pick one up and go to open the cylinder. Colt revolvers, especially the Python, are quite appealing to me.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |